Early Prediction of Intensive Care Unit–Acquired Weakness: A Multicenter External Validation Study

Author:

Witteveen Esther123ORCID,Wieske Luuk123,Sommers Juultje4,Spijkstra Jan-Jaap5,de Waard Monique C.5,Endeman Henrik6,Rijkenberg Saskia6,de Ruijter Wouter7,Sleeswijk Mengalvio8,Verhamme Camiel2,Schultz Marcus J.13,van Schaik Ivo N.2,Horn Janneke13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

4. Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, VU medical center (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands

6. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

7. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands

8. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands

Abstract

Objectives: An early diagnosis of intensive care unit–acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is often not possible due to impaired consciousness. To avoid a diagnostic delay, we previously developed a prediction model, based on single-center data from 212 patients (development cohort), to predict ICU-AW at 2 days after ICU admission. The objective of this study was to investigate the external validity of the original prediction model in a new, multicenter cohort and, if necessary, to update the model. Methods: Newly admitted ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated at 48 hours after ICU admission were included. Predictors were prospectively recorded, and the outcome ICU-AW was defined by an average Medical Research Council score <4. In the validation cohort, consisting of 349 patients, we analyzed performance of the original prediction model by assessment of calibration and discrimination. Additionally, we updated the model in this validation cohort. Finally, we evaluated a new prediction model based on all patients of the development and validation cohort. Results: Of 349 analyzed patients in the validation cohort, 190 (54%) developed ICU-AW. Both model calibration and discrimination of the original model were poor in the validation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.66). Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The new prediction model, based on all patients of the development and validation cohort (total of 536 patients) had a fair discrimination, AUC-ROC: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75). Conclusions: The previously developed prediction model for ICU-AW showed poor performance in a new independent multicenter validation cohort. Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The newly derived prediction model showed fair discrimination. This indicates that early prediction of ICU-AW is still challenging and needs further attention.

Funder

ZonMw

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3