Interference Screw Versus Suture Endobutton Fixation of a Fiber-Reinforced Meniscus Replacement Device in a Human Cadaveric Knee Model

Author:

Patel Jay M.123,Brzezinski Andrzej1,Raole Deep A.1,Dunn Michael G.12,Gatt Charles J.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

3. McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Background: Meniscal lesions represent one of the most common intra-articular knee injuries. Meniscus replacement devices are needed to restore load distribution and knee stability after meniscectomy. Fixation of these devices is crucial to the generation of hoop stresses and the distribution of loads in the joint. Purpose: To evaluate 2 different fixation techniques (suture endobutton and interference screw) for implantation of a novel meniscus device. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 human cadaveric knees (aged 17-61 years), 1 anterior and 2 potential posterior tunnel locations were investigated, and both fixation techniques were tested in each tunnel. The native meniscus roots, devices fixed with a suture endobutton, and devices fixed with an interference screw were gripped with cryoclamps, and tibias were drilled and loaded into a custom jig. Samples were preloaded, preconditioned, loaded for 500 cycles (50-150 N), and tested in tension until failure. Results: For all 3 tunnels, suture fixation resulted in greater elongation (54.1%-150.7% greater; P < .05) during cyclic loading than interference screw fixation, which approximated the native roots. Both fixation techniques displayed ultimate tensile loads in the same range as native roots. However, stiffness of the suture fixation groups (36.5-41.6 N/mm) was only 28% to 37% of that of the interference screw fixation groups (98.7-131.6 N/mm), which had values approaching those of the native roots (anterior: 175.4 ± 24.2 N/mm; posterior: 157.6 ± 22.9 N/mm). Conclusion: Interference screw fixation was found to be superior to suture fixation with regard to elongation and stiffness, a finding that should be considered in the design and implantation of novel meniscus replacement devices. Clinical Relevance: With the emergence of various devices for total meniscus replacement, the establishment of fixation strategies is crucial for the generation of tensile hoop stresses and the efficacy of these approaches.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3