Accuracy Analysis of a Novel Electromagnetic Navigation Procedure Versus a Standard Fluoroscopic Method for Retrograde Drilling of Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee

Author:

Hoffmann Michael12,Petersen Jan Philipp12,Schröder Malte2,Hartel Maximillian2,Kammal Michael3,Rueger Johannes Maria2,Ruecker Andreas Hermann2

Affiliation:

1. Both authors contributed equally and therefore share first authorship

2. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

3. Department of Forensic Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Background: Retrograde drilling for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) remains a challenging operation. Purpose: A novel radiation-free electromagnetic navigation system (ENS)–based method was developed and its feasibility and accuracy for retrograde drilling procedures evaluated and compared with the standard freehand fluoroscopic method in an experimental setting. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A controlled laboratory study with 16 standard freehand fluoroscopically and 16 electromagnetically guided retrograde drilling procedures was performed on 8 cadaveric human knees. Four artificial cartilage lesions (2 on each condyle) were set per knee. Drilling accuracy was determined by final distance from the tip of the drill bit to the tip of the probe hook (D1) and distance between the tip of the drill and the marked lesion on the cartilage surface (D2). Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times were documented, as were directional readjustments or complete restarts. All procedures were timed using a stopwatch. Results: Successful retrograde drilling was accomplished in all 16 cases using the novel ENS-based method and in 11 cases using the standard fluoroscopic technique. The overall mean time for the fluoroscopy-guided procedures was 10 minutes 55 seconds ± 3 minutes 19 seconds and for the ENS method was 5 minutes 34 seconds ± 38 seconds, providing a mean time benefit of 5 minutes 35 seconds ( P < .001). Mean D1 was 3.8 ± 1.6 mm for the standard and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm using the ENS technique ( P = .021), and mean D2 was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm for the standard and 0.9 ± 0.7 mm for the ENS-based method ( P < .001). Conclusion: Compared with the standard fluoroscopic technique, the novel ENS-based method used in this study showed superior accuracy, required less time, and utilized no radiation. Clinical Relevance: The novel method improves a standard operating procedure in terms of accuracy, operation time for the retrograde drilling procedure, and radiation exposure.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3