Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort

Author:

Jain Nitin B.12,Ayers Gregory D.3,Fan Run3,Kuhn John E.2,Warner Jon J.P.4,Baumgarten Keith M.5,Matzkin Elizabeth6,Higgins Laurence D.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA

6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

7. King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, Hamilton, Bermuda

Abstract

Background: The evidence to support operative versus nonoperative treatment for rotator cuff tears is sparse and inconclusive. Purpose: To assess pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing operative and nonoperative treatments for rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From March 2011 to February 2015, a multicenter cohort of patients with rotator cuff tears undergoing operative and nonoperative treatments was recruited. Patients completed a detailed history questionnaire, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized form and underwent magnetic resonance imaging. In addition to baseline assessments, patients received follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Propensity score weighting was used to balance differences in characteristics of the operative and nonoperative groups. Results: Adjusted for propensity scores, the operative (n = 50) and nonoperative (n = 77) groups had similar characteristics, as evidenced by the small standardized mean differences between the groups. Adjusted mean differences in the SPADI and ASES scores between the operative and nonoperative groups were –22.0 points (95% CI, –32.1 to –11.8) and –22.2 points (95% CI, –32.8 to –11.6) at 18 months, respectively. The operative group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who showed ≥30% ( P = .002) and ≥50% ( P < .0001) improvement in SPADI and ASES scores as compared with the nonoperative group. Conclusion: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing operative treatment had significantly better pain and functional outcomes as compared with patients undergoing nonoperative treatment for rotator cuff tears. Differences between the 2 groups in SPADI and ASES scores at the 6- to 18-month time points met the minimal clinically important difference (depending on the threshold used). A large randomized controlled trial is needed to answer this question more definitively.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3