Abstract
In the context of litigated custody disputes, there are important differences between forensic consultants and expert witnesses. They address different subject matter, the discoverability of their files is different, and their expressed opinions are aimed at different targets. Once reviewers convey their initial impressions of an evaluator's work, retaining counsel must decide in which one of these two conflicting roles the reviewer will be most useful. Forensic consultants can provide invaluable assistance to counsel regarding an evaluator's background, methodology, opinion formulation, opinion communication, and possible multiple roles. Principles of the forensic consultation process require that consultants: (1) identify the required expertise; (2) identify the relevant forensic issue; (3) use multiple sources of data; and (4) focus on relevance, reliability, and sufficiency.
Subject
Law,Psychiatry and Mental health
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Role of Work Product Review and Consultancy in Forensic Social Work;Latin American Social Work in the Justice System;2023
2. Forensic Consulting;Encyclopedia of Adolescence;2018
3. Forensic Consulting;Encyclopedia of Adolescence;2016
4. Trial Consultation;Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition;2012-09-26
5. Ethics in Forensic Practice;Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition;2012-09-26