A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Approaches to Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol

Author:

Crankshaw D. P.12,Brown M. J.13,Bjorksten A. R.14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne and Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2. Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne.

3. Honorary Senior Fellow, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne.

4. Medical Scientist, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Abstract

Nineteen adult patients of either gender received intravenous infusions of propofol, scaled to estimated lean body mass (LBM), for 150 minutes as part of a balanced anaesthetic. Arterial blood was assayed for whole blood propofol. The first subject received propofol at a fixed rate of 0.058 mg.min-1.kgLBM-1. Subsequent groups received variable rate infusions based on the ratio of the infusion rate to the propofol concentration at each sampling point in the previous group, multiplied by the target concentration. After groups of one, two, five and 11 subjects, the median weighted residual was 0.040 and median absolute weighted residual was 0.153. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the final group of six females and five males, aged 29 to 70 years and of 16.5 to 44.2% body fat, resulted in a two compartment pharmacokinetic model with coefficients and standard errors of V1=0.102 (0.0155) l/kgLBM, V2=0.257 (0.079) l/kgLBM, k10=0.423 (0.069) /min, k12=0.222 (0.051) /min, k21=0.084 (0.02) /min and clearance=0.0418 (0.0023) l.min-1.kgLBM-1. The only significant covariate was LBM. Within infusion data improved prediction when compared with data derived in previous studies from random observations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3