Assessing progress in managing and improving quality in nascent integrated care systems in England

Author:

Lalani Mirza1ORCID,Sugavanam Priya2,Caiels James3,Crocker Helen2,Gunn Sarah4,Hay Harriet4,Hogan Helen1,Page Bethan5ORCID,Peters Michele2,Fitzpatrick Ray2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

2. Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

3. Personal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

4. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK

5. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Objectives In 2022, England embarked on an ambitious reorganisation to produce an integrated health and care system, intended also to maximise population health. The newly created integrated care systems (ICSs) aim to improve quality of care, by achieving the best outcomes for individuals and populations through the provision of evidence-based services. An emerging approach for managing quality in organisations is the Quality Management System (QMS) framework. Using the framework, this study assessed how ICSs are managing and improving quality. Methods Four ICSs were purposively sampled, with the data collected between November 2021 and May 2022. Semi-structured interviews with system leaders ( n=60) from health and social care, public health and local representatives were held. We also observed key ICS meetings and reviewed relevant documents. A thematic framework approach based on the QMS framework was used to analyse the data. Results The ICSs placed an emphasis on population health, reducing inequity and improving access. This represents a shift in focus from the traditional clinical approach to quality. There were tensions between quality assurance and improvement, with concerns that a narrow focus on assurance would impede ICSs from addressing broader quality issues, such as tackling inequalities and unwarranted variation in care and outcomes. Partnerships, a key enabler for integration, was seen as integral to achieving improvements in quality. Overall, the ICSs expressed concerns that any progress made in quality development and in improving population health would be tempered by unprecedented system pressures. Conclusion It is unclear whether ICSs can achieve their ambition. As they move away from an assurance-dominated model of quality to one that emphasises openness, learning and improvement, they must simultaneously build the digital infrastructure, staff expertise and culture to support such a shift.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference33 articles.

1. Clinically integrated systems: the future of NHS reform in England?

2. Integrated health and social care in England – Progress and prospects

3. Collins B. New care models; Emerging innovations in governance and organisational form, 2016, https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/New_care_models_Kings_Fund_Oct_2016.pdf (accessed 29 September 2023).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3