Tumor treating fields increases blood-brain barrier permeability and relative cerebral blood volume in patients with glioblastoma

Author:

Iv Michael1,Naya Lewis2,Sanan Sajal3,Van Buskirk Samuel L4,Nagpal Seema5,Thomas Reena P5,Recht Lawrence D5,Patel Chirag B678ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

2. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA

3. School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

4. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

5. Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

6. Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

7. Cancer Biology Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (GSBS), Houston, TX, USA

8. Neuroscience Graduate Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-University of Texas at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (GSBS), USA

Abstract

Background and objective 200 kHz tumor treating fields (TTFields) is clinically approved for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). Because its effects on conventional surveillance MRI brain scans are equivocal, we investigated its effects on perfusion MRI (pMRI) brain scans. Methods Each patient underwent institutional standard pMRI: dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) pMRI at three time points: baseline, 2-, and 6-months on-adjuvant therapy. At each timepoint, the difference between T1 pre- versus post-contrast tumor volume (ΔT1) and these pMRI metrics were evaluated: normalized and standardized relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV, sRCBV); fractional plasma volume (Vp), volume of extravascular extracellular space (EES) per volume of tissue (Ve), blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability (Ktrans), and time constant for gadolinium reflux from EES back into the vascular system (Kep). Between-group comparisons were performed using rank-sum analysis, and bootstrapping evaluated likely reproducibility of the results. Results Among 13 pMRI datasets (11 nGBM, 2 recurrent GBM), therapies included temozolomide-only ( n = 9) and temozolomide + TTFields ( n = 4). No significant differences were found in patient or tumor characteristics. Compared to temozolomide-only, temozolomide + TTFields did not significantly affect the percent-change in pMRI metrics from baseline to 2 months. But during the 2- to 6-month period, temozolomide + TTFields significantly increased the percent-change in nRCBV (+26.9% [interquartile range 55.1%] vs -39.1% [37.0%], p = 0.049), sRCBV (+9.5% [39.7%] vs -30.5% [39.4%], p = 0.049), Ktrans (+54.6% [1768.4%] vs -26.9% [61.2%], p = 0.024), Ve (+111.0% [518.1%] vs -13.0% [22.5%], p = 0.048), and Vp (+98.8% [2172.4%] vs -24.6% [53.3%], p = 0.024) compared to temozolomide-only. Conclusion Using pMRI, we provide initial in-human validation of pre-clinical studies regarding the effects of TTFields on tumor blood volume and BBB permeability in GBM.

Funder

McNair Medical Institute at The Robert and Janice McNair Foundation

American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)-Novocure Career Development Award for Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Research

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3