Afghan Scholars’ Response to Perspectives on the Afghanistan War: Arrogant Conquest; Disgraceful Withdrawal

Author:

Arghandwal Nisar Ahmad1ORCID,Omaid Mohammad Ehsan2,Fana Zmarai3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography, Kandahar University, Afghanistan

2. Geography Department of Education Faculty, Kandahar University, Afghanistan

3. Department of Contemporary History of Social Science Faculty, Kabul University, Afghanistan

Abstract

In response to the special issue on the Afghanistan War published by Armed Forces & Society, this article offers alternative perspectives regarding America’s longest war from the point of view of scholars who experienced the war firsthand and continue to live in its aftermath. We argue that Afghanistan was invaded by Western militaries who came to experience political failures and moral regrets. The soil could be conquered, but the Afghan nation has always strictly rejected foreign rulers and dictations. As our research critically evaluated the special issue articles published in the Armed Forces and Society Journal, we believe these articles fall short of reasonable analysis by only considering and analyzing the military strategies, war tactics, and failed stabilization efforts in Afghanistan. Civilian casualties owing to military operations by U.S.-led forces, not establishing an inclusive central government, strong resistance of the Taliban, ignoring the Afghan nation’s core ambitions, Pakistan’s double game policy, and high level of corruption led the U.S. to defeat. Nevertheless, we conclude that the U.S. approach to getting revenge for 9/11 victims and restoring their dignity through banzai attacks, blind bombardments, and night raids in civilians’ homes in Afghan cities and villages and taking innocent lives must be recognized, remembered, and condemned.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference81 articles.

1. Abbas H. (2004). https://www.amazon.com/Pakistans-Drift-Into-Extremism-Americas/dp/0765614979

2. Afghan civilian casualties at record high in first half of: UN 2016. (2016, July 25). The Strait Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/afghan-civilian-casualties-at-record-high-in-first-half-of-2016-un

3. Afzal M. (2021, December 25). The U.S. needs a reset with Pakistan. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/opinion/pakistan-biden-khan.html?searchResultPosition=

4. Air Power, International Organizations, and Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan

5. Ansary T. (2021, September 01). Afghanistan is not “impossible to conquer” but is difficult for imperial power to rule through proxies: Afghan-American author. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202109/1233012.shtml

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3