A brief comparison of forensic psychology in South Africa, the United States, and Canada

Author:

Pillay Anthony L1ORCID,Gowensmith W Neil2,Roesch Ronald3,Hopkins Alexandra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Behavioural Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal and Fort Napier Hospital, South Africa

2. Graduate School of Professional Psychology, University of Denver, USA

3. Simon Fraser University, Canada

Abstract

Considering forensic psychology’s varying stages of development across the world, this work briefly explores historical developments, the field of practice, training, licensing, legislation, and associated challenges in South Africa, the United States, and Canada. While there are numerous similarities, a few differences are evident. Among the common areas of practice, psychologists are involved in assessments to determine fitness (competency) to stand trial, criminal responsibility in adults, as well as assisting courts in making determinations on criminal responsibility in the case of children in conflict with the law. In South Africa, psychological assessments of sexual violence complainants with intellectual disability are also required by courts. Psychological intervention, research, and policy development work are also conducted in the three countries. Challenges appear in the intersection between psychology and the law, expectations of psychologists, and the inclusion of psychologists in evaluation panels in South Africa and Canada. It is clear that psychologists are playing an active role in the professional development of the field, research, and coordinating with legislative authorities in advancing forensic mental health and advocating for people with mental health problems. However, across the three countries, there is a need for continued focus on the broader issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion with respect to the forensic populations being served, and there has to be a concerted effort to address the psychosocial needs of marginalized communities.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference41 articles.

1. Adjorlolo S., Chan H. C. (2016). Determination of competency to stand trial (fitness to plead): An exploratory study in Hong Kong. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 24(2), 205–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080%2F13218719.2016.1247417

2. American Psychological Association. (2014). A career in forensic and public service psychology. https://www.apa.org/education-career/guide/subfields/forensic/education-training

3. Canada v. Ewert, FCA 296 (2015).

4. Canadian Psychological Association. (2022, February 1). Home. https://cpa.ca

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3