The Oral Contraceptive PPI: Its Effect on Patient Knowledge, Feelings, and Behavior

Author:

Sands Charles D.,Robinson J. Daniel,Orlando Jacqueline B.

Abstract

The distribution of the PPI by pharmacists is at best controversial. Although most health professionals agree that the patient has a right to receive information about drugs, they disagree on the best way to provide that information. Since the oral contraceptive PPI has been in routine use for approximately 10 years, a large data base exists that can be used to determine not only patient acceptance of the PPI, but also knowledge, feelings, and behavior secondary to the PPI. In this study, 50 women of childbearing age completed a questionnaire, and it was learned that 84 percent had taken or were currently taking oral contraceptives, and 90 percent of those received a PPI; however, only 61 percent of these women read all of it. The women performed poorly on the knowledge exam (mean ± SD, 44.5 ± 21.2, range, 0–83 percent); those who read all of the PPI or who were white had higher scores (p < 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). Thirty-eight percent of the women thought that the PPI information was inadequate, suggesting that it needs to be rewritten and/or supplemented with information from pharmacists. After reading the PPI, 12 percent contacted their pharmacist for additional information. Pharmacists are in a unique position to provide oral contraceptive information that enables women to make informed judgments regarding benefit: Risk ratios on a personal basis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Written information about individual medicines for consumers;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2009-04-15

2. Educating Adolescents About Acne Vulgaris;Archives of Dermatology;2008-02-01

3. Consumer Medicine Information conundrums;Australian Prescriber;2007-10-01

4. Consumer use of Consumer Medicine Information;Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research;2005-06

5. Consumer opinions on medicines information and factors affecting its use — an Australian experience;International Journal of Pharmacy Practice;2002-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3