Benzonatate Safety and Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Author:

Costantino Ryan C.123,Leonard James4,Gorman Emily F.5,Ventura Davide6,Baltz Alan7,Gressler Laura Elisabeth7

Affiliation:

1. Enterprise Intelligence and Data Solutions Program Management Office, Program Executive Office, Defense Healthcare Management Systems, Rosslyn, VA, USA

2. Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA

3. Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA

4. Maryland Poison Center, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA

5. Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

6. AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA

7. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

Abstract

Objective: To review the available literature regarding the treatment effects and efficacy of benzonatate needed to better inform patients, providers, and regulators evaluating its role in modern medical therapies. Data Sources: Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library, and Scopus for original research articles evaluating the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety profile of benzonatate from January 1956 through August 2022. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The identified studies were screened for relevance and then assessed for inclusion through a full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessment by multiple reviewers using the online software Covidence. Data Synthesis: The selection process resulted in 37 articles consisting of 21 cohort studies, 5 experimental studies, and 11 case studies and series. Initial clinical studies exploring potential therapeutic benefits collected data from very small populations and limited clinical settings. Safety is primarily assessed in terms of toxicity due to overdose or inappropriate use. Quality assessment raised concerns for high degrees of biases primarily related to the limited sample size, data collection, generalizability, and study design. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review reveals substantial limitations within existing evidence pertaining to the safety and clinical effectiveness of benzonatate and thus, a need for large observational studies or randomized trials to better characterize its role and value in modern medical practice. Conclusions: Rising safety concerns should bring closer scrutiny upon the prescription of benzonatate whose approval is founded upon evidence that would not stand up to current regulatory review.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference67 articles.

1. TESSALON® (Benzonatate)-US physician prescribing information. Madison, NJ: Pfizer Inc.; 2010. Accessed January 3, 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/011210s053lbl.pdf

2. Reform, Regulation, and Pharmaceuticals — The Kefauver–Harris Amendments at 50

3. FDA: Evidentiary standards for drug development and approval

4. The pharmacology of cough

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3