Affiliation:
1. Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, UK
Abstract
Recent attempts to problematize archaeological fieldwork have been concerned with excavation at the expense of surface survey, and with questions of procedure more than interpretations of the past. In fact these two kinds of fieldwork offer quite different possibilities and suffer from different constraints. Thought must be given to ways in which they can be combined if they are to make a real contribution to social archaeology. The argument is illustrated by a project carried out at a megalithic cemetery in Scotland.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Archeology
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Social Production of Discourse in Archaeology;Discourse and Argumentation in Archaeology: Conceptual and Computational Approaches;2023
2. EXCAVATING WAR AND IDLENESS: THE CASE OF SVÆRHOLT;Journal of Conflict Archaeology;2022-05-04
3. Scale, Meaning, Experience: Exploring Landscapes;Mining the Landscape;2022
4. Surveying the Past;Mining the Landscape;2022
5. Landscapes, Places and Parts;Mining the Landscape;2022