The privilege of taken for grantedness: On precarity and mobile media

Author:

Ingraham Chris1ORCID,Grandinetti Justin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of Utah, USA

2. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA

Abstract

This essay makes a case for more critical inquiry in mobile media research around the privilege of taken for grantedness. As a critical supplement to Richard Ling’s important work on the taken for granted dispersion and embedment of technologies such as the mobile phone or automobile into everyday life, we examine the precarity that such reliance involves. Taking certain media for granted makes other, more invisible vulnerabilities harder to see and acknowledge. We make this case using the example of TikTok, a short-form mobile streaming app that has rapidly become a go-to social media platform worldwide—as well as a massively “visible” infrastructure due to its associated geopolitical tensions and security concerns. In light of recent conversations about banning the platform, TikTok offers an instructive case study for the privilege of taken for grantedness and the deceptively precarious nature of our mobile media practices.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Reference83 articles.

1. Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life

2. Alton L (2021) How video is reshaping digital advertising. Available at: https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/how-video-is-reshaping-digital-advertising.html (accessed 14 April 2021).

3. Baker-White E (2022) Leaked audio from 80 internal TikTok meetings shows that US user data has been repeatedly accessed from China. Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emilybakerwhite/tiktok-tapes-us-user-data-china-bytedance-access (accessed 15 July 2022).

4. Bates S (1996) The death of geography, the rise of anonymity, and the Internet. American Enterprises 7(2): 50–52.

5. Byford S (2020) TikTok says the Trump administration has forgotten about trying to ban it, would like to know what’s up. Available at: https://www.theverge.com/2020/11/10/21559677/tiktok-cfius-court-petition-ban-deadline (accessed 14 April 2021).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3