CGA: An image processing based software for surface strain analysis in sheet metal forming

Author:

Pankaj Wankhede1ORCID,Radhakrishnan Tejas2,Suresh Kurra1ORCID,Radhika Sudha2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Abstract

Strain analysis is an essential step in sheet forming applications to understand the deformation behaviour of the material. The strain analysis is conventionally performed by Circle Grid Analysis (CGA). In CGA, a grid of circles with 2 mm–5 mm diameter is printed on a flat sheet and deformed into the required shape. The length of major and minor axes of the deformed ellipses are measured to estimate the strains at different locations of the formed component. The major and minor axes length of the deformed ellipses are measured either by using a manual method or automatic methods. The automated methods are faster and accurate compared to manual methods, but to perform strain measurement using commercially available automatic strain measurement system, is very expensive. Therefore, in this paper, an image processing based software has been developed with user-friendly Graphical User Interface (GUI) for strain measurement and analysis in sheet metal forming operations. The software has been tested on images obtained by printing the ellipses of known dimensions on the flat sheet by laser etching, electrochemical etching and screen printing, which are generally used for printing circular grids on flat sheets for strain analysis in sheet metal forming. It is observed that the edges of the laser engraved ellipse are very slim and easily detected by software compared to other grid printing methods. The developed software can measure the ellipse dimensions with a maximum absolute percentage error of 1.975%. Further, the results of CGA software has been compared with the commercial strain measurement system called Grid Pattern Analyzer (GPA). The mean absolute error in strain measurement using CGA and GPA was found to be 0.0106 and 0.0178, respectively. The statistical test results reveal that there is no evidence to support a claim that there is a difference in mean performance between the two methods.

Funder

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Modeling and Simulation

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3