Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners

Author:

Eiraldi Ricardo123ORCID,Comly Rachel1,Wolk Courtney Benjamin3,Rabenau-McDonnell Quinn1,McCurdy Barry L.4,Khanna Muniya S.5,Jawad Abbas F.12,Banks Jayme6,Clark Stacina6,Popkin Kristina M.6,Wilson Tara1,Henson Kathryn1

Affiliation:

1. Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

4. School of Professional & Applied Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. OCD and Anxiety Institute, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA

6. School District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Background Shifting organizational priorities can negatively affect the sustainment of innovations in community settings. Shifting priorities can present barriers to conducting clinical research in schools if a misalignment occurs between school district priorities and the aims of the study. Often this misalignment occurs due to a shift during the period between when the study is submitted for funding and when research activities begin. Participatory research approaches can be employed to restore alignment between study processes and school district priorities. The purpose of the study is to describe data from a shared process with district partners. The shared process resulted in modifications to the main study's implementation processes and strategies in order to restore alignment with evolving school priorities while remaining faithful to the aims of the study. Method Data originated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 school district and school personnel in a large urban school district. Qualitative themes were organized into categories based on a social-ecological school implementation framework. Data from team meetings, meetings with school district administrators, and emails served to supplement and verify findings from interview analyses. Results Themes included barriers and facilitators at the macro-, school-, individual-, team-, and implementation quality levels. Adaptations were made to address barriers and facilitators and restore alignment with school district priorities. Most adaptations to study processes and implementation strategies focused on re-training and providing more information to school district coaches and school-based staff. New procedures were created, and resources were re-allocated for the larger study. Conclusions Findings were discussed in relation to the implementation literature in schools. Recommendations for sustaining strong collaboration among researchers and school partners are provided.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3