Outcomes of Conventional Wound Treatment in a Comprehensive Wound Center

Author:

Akopian Gabriel1,Nunnery Susan P.2,Piangenti Jenny2,Rankin Pam2,Rinoie Chugo2,Lee Elizabeth2,Alexander Magdi12

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Surgery, Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, California and

2. Methodist Hospital Wound Healing Center, Arcadia, California

Abstract

Conventional wound care is the elementary treatment modality for treating chronic wounds. However, early treatment with topical growth factors may be needed for a subset of chronic wounds that fail to heal with good wound care alone. A prospective nonrandomized case series from a single-community outpatient wound care clinic is presented here in an effort to identify the subset of chronic wounds that may require early adjuvant intervention. There were 378 consecutive patients with 774 chronic wounds of varying etiology. All patients received 4 weeks of conventional wound care, including weekly debridement and twice-daily dressing changes. Wounds not reduced by 50 per cent volume at 4 weeks were nonrandomly treated with human skin equivalent (Apligraf®), platelet-derived wound healing factor, or platelet-derived growth factor isoform BB (becaplermin gel, Regranex®). A total of 601 of 774 (78%) wounds healed regardless of treatment type. The median time to heal for all wounds was 49 days (interquartile range = 26–93). More women than men healed (85% vs 71%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Diabetic wounds were as likely to heal as nondiabetic wounds (78% vs 80%, P = 0.5675). Wounds that did not heal had larger volumes and higher grade compared with wounds that healed (P < 0.0001 for both variables). The data presented here show that the majority of chronic wounds will heal with conventional wound care, regardless of etiology. Large wounds with higher grades are less responsive to conventional wound care and will benefit from topical growth factor treatment early in the treatment course.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3