Affiliation:
1. Tennessee Technological University, Box 5052, Cookeville, Tennessee 38505, USA
Abstract
This research examines why nations differ as to rates of imprisonment, prison conditions, and use of capital punishment. Variables representing the major theoretical perspectives are used to examine differences in a much larger sample of nations than has been used in previous research. Regression analysis indicates that homicide rates—and, to a lesser degree, total crime rates—have positive associations to prison rates, whereas street-level law enforcement has a negative association. Dummy variables representing nations grouped by geographic region greatly increase variance explained, indicating a historical-cultural component to use of imprisonment. Little to no support was found for civilization theory, inequality, or unemployment variables. Discriminant analysis indicated that degree of human development and freedom as well as inequality helped classify nations according to prison conditions, whereas the freedom variable helped classify nations that did and did not use capital punishment. Dummy geographic region variables were important in classifying nations by prison conditions and capital punishment, again indicating the probable importance of historicalcultural factors.
Subject
Applied Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. DOES A DIFFERENCE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? COMPARING CROSS-NATIONAL CRIME INDICATORS *
2. Box, S. & Hale, C. (1982). Economic crisis and the rising prisoner population in England andWales. Crime and Social Justice, 17, 20-35.
3. Behind Bars in the U.S. and Europe
4. Penal Sanctions in Poland: A Test of Alternative Models
5. Hill, G. (1999). World prison populations. Corrections Compendium, 24(8), 24-25.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献