Affiliation:
1. University of California, Merced, United States
Abstract
Virtually every city in the United States bans multifamily homes in at least some neighborhoods, and in many cities most residential land is restricted to single family homes. This is the case even though many metropolitan areas are facing skyrocketing housing costs and increased environmental degradation that could be alleviated by denser housing supply. Some scholars have argued that an unrepresentative set of vocal development opponents are the culprits behind this collective action failure. Yet, recent work suggests that opposition to density may be widespread. In this research note, I use a conjoint survey experiment to provide evidence that preferences for single-family development are ubiquitous. Across every demographic subgroup analyzed, respondents preferred single-family home developments by a wide margin. Relative to single family homes, apartments are viewed as decreasing property values, increasing crime rates, lowering school quality, increasing traffic, and decreasing desirability.
Subject
Urban Studies,Sociology and Political Science
Reference31 articles.
1. Abramson Scott, Kocak Korhan, Magazinnik Asya. 2019. What do we Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments. https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/kkocak/files/conjoint_draft.pdf.
2. Badger, Emily and Quoctrung Bui. 2019. “Cities Start to Question an American Ideal: A House with Yard on Every Lot,” New York Times Upshot, June 18, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/18/upshot/cities-across-america-question-single-family-zoning.html
3. Banzhaf H. Spencer, Mangum Kyle. 2020. “Capitalization as a Two-Part Tariff: The Role of Zoning.” FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 19–20.
4. THE DETERMINANTS OF RESTRICTIVE RESIDENTIAL ZONING: SOME EMPIRICAL FINDINGS*
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献