Affiliation:
1. University of Central Florida
2. Suffolk University
Abstract
This article investigates the relative merits of two methods of case discussion. The first is the Harvard Case Method (HCM), and the other is the McAleer Interactive Case Analysis (MICA) method. In the literature, MICA has been proposed as a remedy for the weaknesses of HCM. Here, we report the results from an experiment that assesses the relative effectiveness of these two methods. Our results support the claim that MICA is better than HCM. In particular, we find that MICA enhances student participation in case discussions. This is useful, inasmuch as one important component of active learning is participation.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献