Affiliation:
1. Department of Law and Social Science Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, CZECH REPUBLIC
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of the Occupational Strengthening Pensions Act (OSPA), introduced more than six years ago, on the demand for occupational pension provision (OPP) from the perspective of employees subject to social insurance contributions in Germany. The study incorporates theoretical perspectives on the prevalence of OPP from existing studies at the level of individual households and firms. Data were collected via an online questionnaire from 236 people in Germany who are subject to social security contributions. After receiving the completed questionnaires, they were analyzed and evaluated using IBM SPSS Statistics. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyze the survey data. In particular, correlation and regression analyses were carried out to test the proposed hypotheses. The results of the study show a significant correlation between age, income, and the desire for information, as well as the reasons for not having a workplace pension and for having a mandatory workplace pension. These results provide valuable insights into the extent to which OPP is widespread in Germany. In addition, the study provides recommendations on how to increase interest in and take-up of OPP. The results of this study provide employers and policymakers with a basis for achieving the OSPA’s goal of increasing the prevalence of OPP. It also contributes to the existing literature on possible improvements to OPP and the question of introducing compulsory OPP in Germany. The study also highlights the mediating role of leadership style in the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference33 articles.
1. Fiche, C. (2020). Pension Projections Exercise 2021, [Online]. https://economyfinance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021- 05/de_-_ar_2021_final_pension_fiche.pdf (Accessed Date: March 1, 2024).
2. Caliendo, M., & Hogenacker, J. (2012). The German labor market after the Great Recession: successful reforms and future. challenges. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 1, 1-24, [Online]. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186 /2193-9012-1-3.pdf (Accessed Date: June 27, 2024).
3. German Council of Economic Experts – Annual Report. (2016/17). Pension Provision: Strengthen the three pillar model, [Online]. https://www.sachverstaendigenratwirtschaft.de/fileadmin/dateiablage/gutachten /jg201617/chapter_seven__2_.pdf (Accessed Date: April 30, 2024).
4. Schmähl, W. (1999). Pension Reforms in Germany: Major Topic, Decisions and Developements. In: Müller, K., Ryll, A., Wagener, HJ. (eds) Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Contributions to the economy. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58654- 5_6.
5. Hofelich, A., & Rein, M. (2018). The act to strengthen company pensions is coming – with implications for all employers. Berlin: Your world first January 2018/05, Employment law – in brief, CMS Hasche Sigle Employment & Pensions Practice Area Group, [Online]. https://cms.law/en/media/local/cmshs/files/publications/newsletters/employment -law-in-brief-january-2018 (Accessed Date: June 15, 2024).