Cost and Density Evaluation Function Application, for Optimal Biodiesel Mixtures by Genetic Algorithm Implementation
Author:
Vasileiadis Vasileios1, Kyriklidis Marios-Errikos2, Kyriklidis Christos1, Terzopoyloy Eirini1, Tsanaktsidis Constantinos G.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Kila, GR-50100, Kozani, GREECE 2. Department of Regional Development and Cross Border Studies, University of Western Macedonia, Kila, GR-50100, Kozani, GREECE
Abstract
The current document presents a fresh method for addressing the optimization challenges concerning fuel mixtures in the production of Biodiesel. Given the rising concerns over diesel emissions and the associated expenses, there's a growing interest in exploring alternative fuel options. Traditional desulphurization methods are time-consuming and require substantial financial investments. Conversely, Biodiesel offers a promising solution as it's derived from renewable resources and is environmentally sustainable. This study introduces an enhanced genetic algorithm that assesses the proportions of components within a fuel mixture blend, aiming to create optimal combinations for Biodiesel production. Apart from cost considerations, the density of the fuel, a key physicochemical characteristic, is pivotal in determining its suitability for widespread use and commercialization. Rigorous experimentation has resulted in highly precise Biodiesel blends, suggesting an optimal fuel solution for each specific set. For instance, in Set 1, Biodiesel was composed of 75.031% diesel and 24.969% biodiesel, with a mixture cost of 1.6975 €/l and a density of 0.8355 g/ml. In Set 2, the fuel mixture consisted of 75.016% diesel and 24.984% biodiesel, with a cost of 1.6977 €/l and a density of 0.8366 g/ml. Notably, the new Biodiesel fuels are significantly cheaper, costing 15.13% less (Set 1) and 15.12% less (Set 2) than diesel (priced at 2.0000 €/l) and are proposed between 1.5 * 109 evaluated biodiesel mixtures.
Publisher
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Reference18 articles.
1. S. Semwal, AK. Arora, RP. Badoni, and DK. Tuli, "Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts", Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, pp. 2151–2161, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.080. 2. D. Qarizada, E. Mohammadian, A.B. Alias, H.A. Rahimi, and S.B.M. Yusuf, "Effect of Temperature on Bio-Oil Fractions of Palm Kernel Shell Thermal Distillation", International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 27-31, 2018, https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v1i2.7. 3. E. Lotero, Y. Liu, DE. Lopez, K. Suwannakarn, DA. Bruce and JG. Goodwin, "Synthesis of biodiesel via acid catalysis", Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, No. 14, pp. 5353–5363, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie049157g. 4. GW. Huber, S. Iborra, and A. Corma, "Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts, and engineering", Chemical Reviews, vol. 106, pp. 4044–4098, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068360d. 5. J. Marchetti. V. Miguel, and A., Errazu, "Possible methods for biodiesel production", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 11, pp. 1300–1311, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.08.006.
|
|