Affiliation:
1. Sandia National Laboratories, Geophysical Technology Department, P.O. Box 5800, MS‐0750, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185‐0750. Emails:
Abstract
The bulk electrical anisotropy of sedimentary formations is a macroscopic phenomenon which can result from the presence of porosity variations, laminated shaly sands, and water saturation. Accounting for its effect on induction log responses is an ongoing research problem for the well‐logging community since these types of sedimentary structures have long been correlated with productive hydrocarbon reservoirs such as the Jurassic Norphlet Sandstone and Permian Rotliegendes Sandstone. Presented here is a staggered‐grid finite‐difference method for simulating electromagnetic (EM) induction in a fully 3‐D anisotropic medium. The electrical conductivity of the formation is represented as a full 3 × 3 tensor whose elements can vary arbitrarily with position throughout the formation. To demonstrate the validity of this approach, finite‐difference results are compared against analytic and quasi‐analytic solutions for tractable 1‐D and 3‐D model geometries. As a final example, we simulate 2C–40 induction tool responses in a crossbedded aeolian sandstone to illustrate the magnitude of the challenge faced by interpreters when electrical anisotropy is neglected.
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Reference26 articles.
1. Anderson, B. I., Barber, T. D., and Gianzero, S. C., 1998, The effect of crossbedding anisotropy on induction tool response: 39th Logging Symposium, Soc. Prof. Well Log Anal., Expanded Abstracts, Paper B.
2. Three‐dimensional induction logging problems, Part I: An integral equation solution and model comparisons
3. Difficulties in determining electrical anisotropy in subsurface investigations
Cited by
122 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献