Performance comparison of compact phased arrays and traditional seismic networks for microseismic monitoring at a CO2 sequestration test site

Author:

Zhang Jian1,Hutchenson Kevin D.1,Nyffenegger Paul A.1,Grant Elige B.1,Jennings Jason1,Tinker Mark A.1,Macquet Marie2,Lawton Don C.23

Affiliation:

1. Quantum Technology Sciences, Melbourne, Florida, USA..

2. Carbon Management Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada..

3. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

As carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration scales toward the gigatonnes level, the need for underground reservoir surveillance is driving efforts in advancing technologies for cost-effective passive seismic monitoring. Quantum Technology Sciences, in cooperation with Carbon Management Canada's Containment and Monitoring Institute (CaMI), installed a network of four permanent compact volumetric phased arrays (seismic and acoustic detection and ranging [SADAR] system) at CaMI's Field Research Station (FRS) to demonstrate the results that can be achieved through passive monitoring of microseismicity using this technology. Configured as a sparse network, the SADAR arrays provide passive, persistent, and permanent data acquisition and analysis for monitoring microseismicity in the earth volume of interest. Data from the phased arrays are processed to take advantage of the spatial coherence of the incident seismic signals to increase signal resolution while suppressing noise and clutter signals and providing signal attributes such as angle of incidence and phase velocity. The CaMI FRS has a network of 28 permanent surface stations that are deployed in an x-shaped geometry centered on the injection well. It has a downhole array of 24 geophones that are permanently deployed in an observation well. This provides a ready and unique opportunity to evaluate the detection and location performance of the different systems for passive seismic monitoring. We analyze observations of five example events selected from the microseismicity detected by the SADAR arrays with moment magnitudes (Mw) down to approximately −2. Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and location uncertainties are compared for the events acquired using SADAR arrays versus the surface sensors. The results demonstrate improved performance of networked SADAR arrays compared to traditional surface sensor deployment for detecting and locating microseismicity. Specifically, the results show that coherent processing of SADAR arrays achieves S/N gains up to about 20 dB and location errors down to 10 m.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geology,Geophysics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Automated processing development at a CO2 site: Phase detection, location, magnitude;Third International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy Expanded Abstracts;2023-12-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3