The GPR refraction method

Author:

Bohidar Rabi N.1,Hermance John F.2

Affiliation:

1. Principal Secretary to Government, Steel and Mines Department, Orissa Secretariat, Bhubaneswar, 751001 Orissa, India.

2. Brown University, Department of Geological Sciences, Environmental Geophysics/Hydrology Group, 324 Brook Street, Box 1846, Providence, Rhode Island 02912‐1846.

Abstract

Refracted phases have been a recognized feature in wide‐angle common midpoint (CMP) and common shotpoint (CSP) ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) surveys for many years, but historically their use has been limited and overshadowed by conventional reflection profiling techniques. In truth, the GPR refraction method holds great promise, as we show using four field examples from three sites in the northeastern United States. Typical refractors are shallow bedrock or coarse‐grained unconsolidated sediments (where the dielectric constant K ≈ 6–7) beneath partially saturated fine‐grained sand or silt (K ≈ 15–16). Under appropriate conditions, refracted phases can be detected readily at transmitter–receiver (Tx–Rx) offsets of >15 m and from depths of >2 m. Adapting procedures from refraction seismology, we interpret GPR data from reversed CSP soundings using dipping planar interface models and delay time analyses. Results from the two approaches are quite consistent, further corroborated at one of the sites by a GPR reflection profile and directly verified by a series of hammer‐driven probes. In addition to refractions from higher velocity layers in the subsurface, the air refracted phase (the ubiquitous phase refracted from the air–earth interface) can provide important constraints on interpreting the subsurface—particularly useful when attempting to resolve a shallow interface (depth ≤ 0.5 m) whose GPR signature might be masked by interacting phases at early traveltime and small transmitter–receiver offsets. Finally, a cautionary note for interpreting conventional reflection profile data when delineating a higher velocity interface at a depth that might be on the order of the antenna separation or less. Since the refracted phase arrives earlier than the reflected phase for Tx–Rx offsets beyond the critical distance, in certain cases the first break on a reflection radargram may actually be a refraction. CMP or CSP soundings in support of conventional GPR profiles can resolve such concerns.

Publisher

Society of Exploration Geophysicists

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference21 articles.

1. Impulse radar sounding in permafrost

2. Arcone, S. A., 1984, Radar detection of ground water: in Proc. Ground‐Water Detection Workshop, 68–76.

3. Arcone, S. A., Lawson, D. E., and Delaney, A. J., 1993, Radar reflection and refraction profiles of seasonal thaw over permafrost in Fairbanks, Alaska: Proc. 2nd Government Workshop on Ground‐Penetrating Radar, 241–256.Proc. 2nd Government Workshop on Ground‐Penetrating Radar

4. Ground‐penetratinng radar reflection profiling of groundwater and bedrock in an area of discontinuous permafrost

5. Barry, K. M., 1967, Delay time and its application to refraction profile interpretation, in Musgrave, A. W., Ed., Seismic refraction prospecting: Soc. Expl. Geophys., 348–362.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3