Author:
Livson Maya,Eshtokin Sergey,Vasyukov Vitalii,Yudina Elena,Baybarin Andrey,Pivneva Svetlana
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the research is to examine the impact of digital technologies introduced into law on the formation of new legal practices.Method: The authors used a mixed methodological strategy. The main research method is the dialectical method. Regulatory documents of Russia and foreign countries were chosen as the information basis for the research.Results: The article examines the Russian and international experience of organizing legal activities using innovative digital technologies that allow organizing the effective work of a lawyer in legal support of economic and other regulated activities, preparing for the adoption of regulatory legal acts, optimizing legal proceedings. The authors assess the possibilities and prospects of using intelligent digital systems in the practice of a professional lawyer, law-making, the use of artificial intelligence in the field of justice, as well as the risks that such use may carry.Conclusions: The terms of preparation of regulatory legal acts are reduced in digital content, their quality is improved, the procedural form and other types of law enforcement are optimized. However, the total and uncontrolled use of digital technologies in law can lead to a violation of human rights. The purpose of the author of the presented article was to study the innovations used in modern jurisprudence, to determine their capabilities and limitations in use. Authors conclude that the use of digital technologies in law-making and law enforcement should be based on strict observance of basic human and civil rights
Publisher
Centro Universitario Sao Francisco de Barreiras
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Development
Reference31 articles.
1. ALETRAS, N., TSARAPATSANIS, D., PREOŢIUC-PIETRO, D., LAMPOS, V. (2017). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. PLoS ONE, 12. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93
2. BONDAR, N.S. (2019). Informatsionno-tsifrovoe prostranstvo v konstitutsionnom izmerenii: iz praktiki Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Information and digital space in the constitutional dimension: from the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 11, 28.
3. CEPEJ. (2018). European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for%20publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c Accessed: 29 Apr. 2021.
4. CHERVONYUK, V.I. (2020). Metodologiya podgotovki nauchnogo issledovaniya v yuridicheskoi otrasli nauki [Methodology for the preparation of scientific research in the legal branch of science]. Moscow: The Vladimir Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.
5. CHERVONYUK, V.I. (2020). Predmet (predmetnye oblasti) i normativnaya struktura konstitutsionnogo prava v pravovom diskurse [Subject (subject areas) and normative structure of constitutional law in legal discourse]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2, 50–58.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献