Every one counts: A retrospective cohort study examining the safety of extending pre-transfusion compatibility testing from 72 hours to 7 days in hematology patients receiving red blood cell transfusions

Author:

Ambrose Harriet1,Hedrick Ashlee2,de Leur Marcus3,Elton Georgina3,Evans (Bruce) Alicia3,Mullen Rebecca3,Rowlings Philip4,Ross Bryony1,Prasad Ritam1,K Enjeti Anoop5

Affiliation:

1. NSW Health Pathology – North, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia, Hunter New England Health Service, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia, Calvary Mater Haematology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

2. Hunter New England Health Service, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia

3. Calvary Mater Haematology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

4. Hunter New England Health Service, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia, Calvary Mater Haematology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

5. NSW Health Pathology – North, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia, Hunter New England Health Service, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia, Calvary Mater Haematology Department, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the safety of extending the pretransfusion compatibility testing (PTCT) interval from 72 hours to 7 days in hematology patients receiving packed red blood cells (PRBC). Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study over two years when the local protocol for PTCT in recently transfused hematology patients was changed from 72 hours to 7 days. All transfusions from 12 months prior and post this date were exported from eBlood and analyzed. The primary outcome was the incidence of transfusion reactions. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the chronically transfused patient group and patients with PTCT > 72 hours. Results: A total of 2079 packs were analyzed from 227 patients. Only 37 transfusions that fulfilled the extended crossmatch. There were five (0.69%) transfusion reactions within the post-protocol change cohort and no transfusion reactions in the pre-protocol change cohort. All transfusion reactions occurred in the greater 72-hour subgroup of the post-protocol change cohort. At the time of reaction, there were no alloantibodies identified. No patients demonstrated new alloantibodies post-reaction. Conclusion: This study found no evidence for an increased risk of transfusion reactions associated with increasing the PTCT interval from 72 hours to 7 days in a subset of chronically transfused hematology patients. Extending the PTCT interval could decrease costs, decrease patient infection risk, improve comfort, and conserve public health resources. Further evaluation in a larger cohort is necessary.

Publisher

Edorium Journals Pvt. Ltd.

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3