Youth Perceptions of the War in Ukraine and its Possible Consequences (On the Case of Armenian Youth in Yerevan)

Author:

Atanesyan ArthurORCID,Mkrtichyan ArturORCID

Abstract

To discover the geopolitical orientation and opinions of the Armenia’s youth regarding Russia’s war in Ukraine in the context of regional security issues, a sociological study was conducted in Yerevan and Armenia’s provinces in 2022. It was carried out by specialists from the Faculty of Sociology of the Yerevan State University, in cooperation with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation office in Armenia, and Socies expert center. The study aimed to discover the youth’s perceptions of the reasons for Russia’s war in Ukraine, which started on February 24, 2022, including its possible impact on the region. The research was carried out from October 22, 2022 to November 22, 2022 with youth (18-35 age group) residing in Yerevan (the capital of Armenia) and all provinces of Armenia, using the focus group discussion method. In this paper, we discuss conclusions drawn from focus group discussions with Yerevan residents. The perceptions of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict by Armenia’s youth refers to its geopolitical nature, to the interests of Russia, NATO, EU, USA, Turkey in the post-Soviet space, as well as to personal qualities, approaches, and issues of the leaders of Russia and Ukraine. In general, according to Armenian young people, Armenia should remain as neutral as possible in its position on the war in Ukraine, taking no side in this conflict.

Publisher

Yerevan State University

Reference30 articles.

1. Annexation Chronicles: ‘Crimean spring’ in the Memories of Participants in the Events. (2019, March 19). BBC News. Retrieved November 23 from https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-47609756

2. Åslund, A. (2009). How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics

3. Bowen, A. S. (2022). “Russia’s War in Ukraine: Military and Intelligence Aspects”. Congressional Research Service, R47068. Retrieved November 23, 2022 from https://crsreports.congress.gov

4. Brzezinski, Z. K. (2006). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. [Repr.] ed. New York NY: Basic Books.

5. Cheterian, V. (2008). ”Georgia’s Rose Revolution: Change or Repetition? Tension between State-Building and Modernization Projects”. Nationalities Papers, 36(4), pp. 689–712. doi:10.1080/00905990802230530

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3