Affiliation:
1. Purdue University
2. University of Lüneberg
Abstract
While biosemiotics moves in the direction of liberating both biology and semiotics from strict observance of the paradigms of the 19th and 20th centuries – via evo-devo-eco models and the ontological turn – we propose a glance backwards as well as a sharper focus on the social and sexual conditions of the present and foreseeable future. We bring together contemporary discourses on feminism, biophilia, biophobia, essentialisms, and denial, with the prescient ideas of biopower developed by Michel Foucault with respect to the nation-state. He addressed a bevy of pathologies endemic in the societies he witnessed at that time; these conditions persist and indeed have flourished, ranging from sexism, to racism, to classism, to technologism, to the outsourcing of work and the exporting of refuse, to the addictive mantra of “sustainability”, all culminating in society’s exercising of power over both life and death, both living and dying, both near and far. We also find biopower a suitable critical lens for pursuing the pathologies surrounding population – population as generated, as regulated, as ignored, as denied, whether or not acknowledged as being the work of wombs.
Reference132 articles.
1. ABERNETHY, V. D. (1993) Population Politics : The Choices that Shape our Future. New York : Plenum.
2. ABERNETHY, V. D. (1994) “Optimism and Overpopulation”. In The Atlantic Monthly (274) 6 : 84-91.
3. ABRAM, D., (2010) Becoming Animal : An Earthly Cosmology. New York : Pantheon.
4. ADAMS, R. N. (1988) The Eighth Day : Social Evolution as the Self-Organization of Energy. Austin : University of Texas Press.
5. AGAMBEN, G. (1998[1995]) Homo Sacer : Sovereign Power and Bare Life, translated from the Italian by D. Heller-Roazen. Stanford : Stanford University Press. The original, Homo Sacer : Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Rome : Giulio Einaudi, editor, 1995.