Affiliation:
1. London School of Economics
Abstract
Given the deadlock of the Doha Round, most of the commentators pointed to the risks of this failure. Contrary to this standpoint, the article sees the abandon of negotiations rather as a chance for escape from a system that did not deliver the outcomes needed. What the future shall bring is first a better equilibrium between trade and financial markets and second a just treatment of developing countries’ interests. The article ends with some propositions in that sense.
Reference20 articles.
1. Akyuz, Y. (2005), The WTO Negotiations on Industrial Tariffs: What is at Stake for Developing Countries, Geneva: Third World Network
2. Akyuz, Y. (2006), “Multilateral disciplines and the question of policy space”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
3. Anderson, E. (2005), “Openness and inequality in developing countries: A review of theories and recent evidence”, World Development 33 (7), pp. 1045-1063
4. Bairoch, P. (1993), Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
5. Baldwin, R. (2005), “Heterogeneous firms & trade: Testable and untestable properties of the Melitz model”, NBER Working Papers: National Bureau of Economic Research
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献