Do Clinical Ethicists Improve with Experience? And, If So, How Would We Know?

Author:

Seavilleklein Victoria12,Flynn Jennifer3,Frolic Andrea45,Wagner Frank678,Lee-Ameduri Katarina910

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Ethics Service, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

2. John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

3. Centre for Bioethics, Memorial University, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada

4. Program for Ethics and Care Ecologies (PEaCE), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

6. Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Reseau Compassion Network, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

10. Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Abstract

During our workshop at the 2023 CBS-SCB Workshop and Community Forum, we explored and problematized the concept of “improvement” of clinical ethicists, situated within the larger context of discussions about the professionalization of clinical ethics. This summary provides key insights on this topic by clinical ethicists from across Canada and includes suggestions for steps that we might want to take in the field to enable and support the improvement of clinical ethicists going forward.

Publisher

Consortium Erudit

Reference12 articles.

1. Canadian Association of Practicing Healthcare Ethicists/Association Canadienne des éthiciens en soins de santé.

2. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Core Competencies for Healthcare Ethics Consultation. 2nd edition. 2011.

3. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Healthcare Ethics Consultation-Certified Program. HCEC Certification Commission.

4. Finns JJ, Kodish E, Cohn F, et al. A pilot evaluation of portfolios for quality attestation of clinical ethics consultants. American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(3):15-24.

5. Pearlman RA, Foglia MB, Cohen JH, Chanko BL, Berkowitz KA. Ethics consultation quality assessment tool: a novel method for assessing the quality of ethics case consultations based on written records. American Journal of Bioethics. 2016;16(3):3-14.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3