Affiliation:
1. Professor, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (Poland) ; leszek.butowski@gmail.com
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the developments concerning the issue of disciplinarity and non-disciplinarity of tourism studies. The topic is embedded in a wider context of the academic identity of the community of tourism researchers. As the theoretical foundations for the discussion some concepts of non-classical sociology of science (rooted in Thomas Kuhn’s theory of development of science and ideas of the “Strong Programme”) were used. In order to analyze the problem theoretically and empirically, a three-stage research framework was adopted, commencing with a directed review of Anglo-American and Francophone literature, followed by a survey of a purposeful sample of tourism academics and concluding with a further analysis of the literature, this time confronting empirical findings with the identified scholars’ stances. The empirical research included a survey carried out among approximately 270 scholars of tourism from almost 50 countries from all the continents.
Reference100 articles.
1. Airey, David, 2008, “Tourism Education Life Begins at 40,” Téoros, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 27-32.
2. Aronowitz, Stanley and Henry Giroux, 1991, Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture and Social Criticism, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
3. Ascânio, Alfredo, 1992, “Turismo: La ciencia social de los viajes” [Tourism: The social science of travel], Estudios y Perspectivas en Turismo, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 185-197.
4. Ascânio, Alfredo, 2010, “El Objeto del turismo: Una posible ciencia social de los viajes? Pasos” [The subject of tourism: A possible social science of travel? Steps], Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 633-641.
5. Ateljevic, Irena, Annette Pritchard, and Nigel Morgan, 2007, The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methodologies, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献