Abstract
Background: The first version of the Perrotta Human Emotions Model (PHEM) responded to the need for better structuring, in a functional framework, of emotions and sentiments, giving the proper role to anxiety, according to a neurobiological perspective, in a strategic scheme, but needs structural and functional corrections. Methods: Clinical interview, based on narrative-anamnestic and documentary evidence, and battery of psychometric tests. Results: Statistical comparison of data obtained by administering PHEM-1 versus data obtained by administering PHEM-2 reported an R = 0.999, with p = ≤0.001, as is the case when testing clinical utility by assessing it using MMPI-2-RF and PICI-2. Conclusion: This research confirms the clinical usefulness of administering the PHEM-2, compared with the previous version, during psychotherapeutic encounters conducted according to the brief or otherwise integrated strategic approach.
Publisher
Peertechz Publications Private Limited
Reference45 articles.
1. 1. Perrotta, G. The "Human Emotions" and the "Perrotta Human Emotions Model" (PHEM): The new theoretical model. Historical, neurobiological and clinical profiles. Arch Depress Anxiety. 2021; 7(2): 020-028.
2. 2. Treccani. Vocabulary. Source: treccani.it/vocabolario/. Accessed on date: 22.07.2023-25.07.2023.
3. 3. Zanichelli. Vocabulary. Source: dizionari.zanichelli.it/. Accessed on date: 22.07.2023-25.07.2023.
4. 4. Oxford University Press. Oxford (dictionary). English-Italian, Italian-English. Paravia Ed.; 2006.
5. 5. Picchi F. Hoepli Big Dictionary. English-Italian, Italian-English. Hoepli Ed. 2016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献