Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain

Author:

van Kerkoerle Timo123ORCID,Pape Louise14,Ekramnia Milad1ORCID,Feng Xiaoxia15,Tasserie Jordy16ORCID,Dupont Morgan1,Li Xiaolian78,Jarraya Bechir19,Vanduffel Wim781011ORCID,Dehaene Stanislas112ORCID,Dehaene-Lambertz Ghislaine1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center

2. Department of Neurophysics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen

3. Department of Neurobiology and Aging, Biomedical Primate Research Centre

4. Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

5. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University

6. Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School

7. Department of Neurosciences, Laboratory of Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven Medical School

8. Leuven Brain Institute

9. Université Paris-Saclay (UVSQ)

10. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital

11. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School

12. Collège de France, Université Paris

Abstract

The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominization. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.

Publisher

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3