Advanced Technology and Analytical Methods for Assessing the Impact of Anticancer Drug Metabolites on Drug Efficacy and Toxicity
-
Published:2024-06-01
Issue:2
Volume:13
Page:884-892
-
ISSN:2409-9368
-
Container-title:Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE)
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:BBE
Author:
Akhtar Shamim,Mansoor Shahbaz Hassan,Batool Saima,Dayyan Sumeet,Akbar Sania
Abstract
This study focuses on advancing the analysis of anticancer drug metabolites by integrating cutting-edge analytical and computational techniques. To improve the separation and identification of metabolites, we employ advanced chromatographic methods, including Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. These techniques provide enhanced resolution and accuracy in metabolite profiling. Computational approaches, such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, are utilized to predict metabolic pathways and identify novel metabolites, while quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models assess biological activity and potential toxicity. The study reveals that Metabolite A exhibits high binding affinity and favorable reaction energy, suggesting its significant role in drug efficacy, whereas Metabolite B, despite lower binding affinity, shows higher potency and may contribute substantially to therapeutic effects. In contrast, Metabolite C, with the lowest binding affinity and less favorable reaction energy, presents potential safety concerns. This integrated methodology highlights the importance of combining advanced analytical techniques with computational models to optimize drug development and personalized medicine. The findings underscore the potential for improved therapeutic efficacy and safety in oncology through detailed metabolite analysis.
Publisher
Research for Humanity (Private) Limited
Reference22 articles.
1. Ando, J., Yano, T.-a., Fujita, K., & Kawata, S. (2013). Metal nanoparticles for nano-imaging and nano-analysis. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 15(33), 13713-13722. 2. Chen, L., Wu, Q., Gao, J., Li, H., Dong, S., Shi, X., & Zhao, L. (2019). Applications of covalent organic frameworks in analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 113, 182-193. 3. Choi, J. R. (2020). Development of point-of-care biosensors for COVID-19. Frontiers in chemistry, 8, 517. 4. Foroutan, A., Guo, A. C., Vazquez-Fresno, R., Lipfert, M., Zhang, L., Zheng, J., Badran, H., Budinski, Z., Mandal, R., & Ametaj, B. N. (2019). Chemical composition of commercial cow’s milk. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 67(17), 4897-4914. 5. Guengerich, F. P. (2008). Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology. Chemical research in toxicology, 21(1), 70-83.
|
|