Determination of LC-MS/MS phenolic profile, antioxidant and α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition activities of Linum mucronatum Bertol. subsp. armenum (Bordz.) P.H.Davis
-
Published:2022-11-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2687-6698
-
Container-title:Turkish Journal of Analytical Chemistry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:TurkJAC
Author:
KILIÇ Fatma1, AKAR Zeynep2
Affiliation:
1. GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2. GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, GENETİK VE BİYOMÜHENDİSLİK BÖLÜMÜ
Abstract
Plants include compounds having high antioxidant activity such as flavonoids, phenolics, and carotenoids. Antioxidant defense mechanisms play an important role in the prevention and treatment of oxidative stress diseases in humans. In the present study, the flower and leaf parts of Linum mucronatum subsp. armenum were extracted in five different solvents. The antioxidant activities of the extracts were determine using six antioxidant activity determination assays (Iron (III) reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), DPPH radical scavenging activity, copper (II) reducing antioxidant activity (CUPRAC), ABTS radical scavenging capacity, total flavonoid content and total phenolic content). While, the methanol extract showed the highest activity for the flower part, ethanol extracts of leaf part showed the highest antioxidant activity in the DPPH, FRAP and CUPRAC tests. The highest activity values in both flower and leaf parts was measured in acetone extract with SC50=0.287 mg/mL and (SC50=0.163 mg/mL in ABTS test, respectively. Lowest activity values of solvent extracts were measured in hexane extracts in all tests. Phenolic compounds of the plant were identified using LC-MS/MS. These phenolics are kaempferol, vanillin, protecatechuic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, p-OH benzoic acid, salicylic acid, quercetin and rutin. The leaf and flower parts have α-glucosidase enzyme inhibitor effect. It was determined that the leaf part of the plant (IC50=4.533 mg/mL) have higher enzyme inhibition than in the flower (IC50=6.096 mg/mL). As a result, it was determined that the plant showed the biological activity. The results will contribute to the studies on the biological activity of the other plant.
Publisher
Turkish Journal of Analytical Chemistry.
Reference57 articles.
1. [1] J. Finaud, G. Lac, E. Filaire, Oxidative stress, Sports Med, 36(4), 2006. 327-358. 2. [2] V. Lobo, A. Patil, A. Phatak, N. Chandra, Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health, Pharmacogn Rev, 4(8), 2010, 118-126. 3. [3] L. Gate, J. Paul, G.N. Ba, K.D Tew, H. Tapiero, Oxidative stress induced in pathologies: the role of antioxidants, Biomed Pharmacother, 53(4), 1999, 169-180. 4. [4] Ş. Gökpınar, T. Koray, E. Akçiçek, T. Göksan, Y. Durmaz, Algal Antioksidanlar, E U Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 23, 2006, 85–89 (In Turkish). 5. [5] V. Calabrese, C. Cornelius, A.T. Dinkova-Kostova, E.J.Calabrese, M.P. Mattson, 2010. Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders, Antioxid Redox Signal, 13(11), 2010, 1763-1811.
|
|