Affiliation:
1. Belgorod Regional Clinical Hospital; Belgorod National Research University
2. Belgorod National Research University
3. Belgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
4. City Clinical Hospital № 4 of the Sochi City Health Department; Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Abstract
Aim. To study the frequency and validity of posterior aortoplasty for bioprosthetics of the aortic valve.Materials and methods. To study the problem of the required aortoplasty frequency and reliability of the study, 99 patients with Neo-Cor “Uniline” 21-size bioprosthesis implantation were selected. According to the presence/absence of posterior arthroplasty, patients were divided into two groups. In the postoperative period the groups were compared according to the following criteria: left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LV EDV), ejection fraction (LV EF), stroke volume (LV SV), peak and mean valve gradients. Following parameters were calculated stroke volume index (SVI) and valve effective orifice area index (EOAI).Results. There were no significant differences in postoperative data between the groups. In the group without an aortic aneurysm, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LV EDV), stroke volume (LV SV), peak and mean valve gradients. were slightly larger. In the second group, ejection fraction (LV EF), and peripheral perfusion index were slightly larger. Which with lower gradients on the valve indicates more optimal contractility of the left ventricle.Conclusion. In our practice in all cases, posterior aortoplasty was performed as indicated. Group of patients with aortoplasty demonstrated more optimal left ventricle function. Probably aortoplasty is to be applied more frequently.
Reference14 articles.
1. Assotsiatsiya serdechno-sosudistykh khirurgov Rossii. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii: Aortalnyy stenoz [Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia. Clinical guidelines: Aortic stenosis]. Moscow, 2020.
2. Belov Yu.V. Vliyanie nesootvetstviya diametra proteza i ploshchadi poverkhnosti tela patsienta na otdalennye rezultaty protezirovaniya aortalnogo klapana [Influence of mismatch between prosthesis diameter and body surface area on long-term results of aortic valve replacement]. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya - Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, No. 9 (2), pp. 46-51.
3. Bokeriya L.A. Metody ekhokardiograficheskoy otsenki gemodinamiki aortalnogo klapana posle protezirovaniya: metody i predosterezheniya [Methods for echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve hemodynamics after prosthesis: methods and cautions]. Kreativnaya kardiologiya - Creative cardiology, 2012, Vol. 1, pp. 73-79.
4. Karaskov A.M. Otechestvennyy biologicheskiy protez novogo pokoleniya «Yunilayn» v khirurgii mitralnogo poroka: pervyy opyt [Domestic New Generation Biological Prosthesis “Uniline” in Surgery for Mitral Failure: First Experience]. Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya - Breast and cardiovascular surgery, 2017, No. 59 (2), pp. 98-104.
5. Klyshnikov K.Yu. Funktsionalnye kharakteristiki bioprotezov «Yunilayn» [Functional characteristics of “Uniline” bioprostheses].]. Kompleksnye problemy serdechnososudistykh zabolevaniy - Complex problems of cardiovascular diseases, 2017, No. (3), pp. 6-12.