Application of the fuzzy sets theory in the problem of products competitiveness evaluation

Author:

Kostikova A. V.1ORCID,Kuznetsov S. Yu.1ORCID,Tereliansky P. V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Volgograd State Technical University

2. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Abstract

The article considers an example of using the tools of fuzzy sets theory in the problem of studying competitiveness of goods and firms. The competitiveness of goods has been defined through their utility in both subjective and objective manifestations. The transformation of utility indicators value from the simplest scales to the scale of equal relations has been carried out through the graphical membership functions. The general model of multi-criteria choice of optimal alternatives based on the intersection of fuzzy sets has been defined. The construction method and non-dominant alternatives set analysis on the basis of fuzzy preference relation has been considered. The problem of ranking alternatives, that are complex technical devices, considering several comparison criteria, some of which are qualitative, has been assessed by dimensionless scales with expert evaluations. Weighting coefficients have been determined for all criteria, alternatives functions belonging to the subset of optimal and matrices of fuzzy preference relations constructed, and a subset of non-dominant alternatives formed. The optimal alternative has been determined by the maximum value of subset elements. Calculation results can be used for further informed decision making in the absence of clear numerical data and presence of weakly formalized expert statements. Thus, the effectiveness and practicality of applying fuzzy sets methodology in ranking problems and optimal choice of alternatives has been shown.

Publisher

State University of Management

Subject

General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Azgaldov G.G. (1982), Theory and practice of assessing the quality of goods. Fundamentals of Qualimetry, Economics, Moscow (in Russian).

2. Azgaldov G.G. (1989), Qualimetry in architectural and construction design, Stroyizdat, Moscow (in Russian).

3. Azgaldov G.G., Raikhman E.P. (1973), About Qualimetry, Publ. House of Standards, Moscow (in Russian).

4. Bronevich A.G., Lepskiy A.E. (2001), Fuzzy models of data analysis and decision making, Higher School of Economics Publ. House, Moscow (in Russian).

5. Dekatov D.E. (2008), “Multi-criteria assessment of the competitiveness of innovative organizations by automated methods of the ELECTRE family”, Innovation Management, no. 3, pp. 180–186 (in Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3