Author:
Tozer Katherine N.,Müller Karin,Craven Tony,Tarbotton Ian,Coster Allen,Burke Rick,Sherlock Jon,Cameron Catherine
Abstract
Deferred grazing is a commonly used tool to manage feed surpluses. The effect of deferred grazing on pasture nutritive value and productivity was quantified in a split-paddock trial on three hill country farms in Waikato and Bay of Plenty from October 2018 until May 2020. Livestock were excluded from the deferred pasture between mid-October 2018 and March 2019. Thereafter, both treatments were rotationally grazed in common with cattle or sheep depending on the farm. Total annual dry matter production was 15% greater in the deferred than grazed treatment for the 12 months after deferring (8.9 vs 7.7 t DM/ha, P<0.05). Metabolisable energy (ME) values at the end of the deferred period were lower in the deferred than grazed treatment (P<0.01) but similar in both treatments thereafter. The content of legumes other than white clover (Trifolium repens) was higher in deferred than grazed pastures in spring 2019 on one of the farms (treatment × farm interaction P<0.05). Ground cover of perennial ryegrass was greater and the area of bare ground smaller, in the deferred than grazed treatment on three of five occasions from after the beginning of the deferred period until up to 8 months after deferring (P<0.05). There was no difference between treatments in decomposition and stabilisation of organic matter (P>0.05). The topsoil water content was higher in the deferred than grazed treatment for 12 months after deferring. In comparison to regular grazing between October and March, deferred pastures provided drought feed in autumn 2019. Pasture productivity was increased after the deferred period without negative impacts on ME.
Publisher
New Zealand Grassland Association
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Plant Science,Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference32 articles.
1. Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A. 2013. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 58: 216-234.
2. Cardoso EJBN, Vasconcellos RLF, Bini D, Miyauchi MYH, Santos CAd, Alves PRL, Paula AMd, Nakatani AS, Pereira JdM, Nogueira MA. 2013. Soil health: looking for suitable indicators. What should be considered to assess the effects of use and management on soil health? Scientia Agricola 70: 274-289.
3. Cayley JWD, Bird PR. 1996. Techniques for measuring pastures. Department of Agriculture Technical Report Series No. 191. Second ed: Department of Agriculture Energy and Minerals, p43-45 p.
4. Chaer G, Fernandes M, Myrold D, Bottomley P. 2009. Comparative resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in adjacent native forest and agricultural soils. Microbial Ecology 58: 414-424.
5. Chen M-M, Zhu Y-G, Su Y-H, Chen B-D, Fu B-J, Marschner P. 2007. Effects of soil moisture and plant interactions on the soil microbial community structure. European Journal of Soil Biology 43: 31-38.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献