The "never-proved" triangle inequality: A GeoGebra & CAS approach
-
Published:2023
Issue:10
Volume:8
Page:22593-22642
-
ISSN:2473-6988
-
Container-title:AIMS Mathematics
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:MATH
Author:
Kovács Zoltán1, Recio Tomás2, Ueno Carlos3, Vajda Róbert45
Affiliation:
1. The Private University College of Education of the Diocese of Linz, Salesianumweg 3, 4020 Linz 2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Higher Polytechnical School, University Antonio de Nebrija, C. Santa Cruz de Marcenado 27, Madrid 28015, Spain 3. CEAD Prof. Félix Pérez Parrilla, C. Doctor García Castrillo, 22, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35005, Spain 4. School of Education, Johannes Kepler University, Linz 4040, Austria 5. Bolyai Institute, University of Szeged, Szeged 6723, Hungary
Abstract
<abstract><p>We use a quite simple, yet challenging, elementary geometry statement, the so-called "never proved" (by a mathematician) theorem, introduced by Prof. Jiawei Hong in his communication to the IEEE 1986 Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, to exemplify and analyze the current situation of achievements, ongoing improvements and limitations of GeoGebra's automated reasoning tools, as well as other computer algebra systems, in dealing with geometric inequalities. We present a large collection of facts describing the curious (and confusing) history behind the statement and its connection to automated deduction. An easy proof of the "never proved" theorem, relying on some previous (but not trivial) human work is included. Moreover, as part of our strategy to address this challenging result with automated tools, we formulate a large list of variants of the "never proved" statement (generalizations, special cases, etc.). Addressing such variants with GeoGebra Discovery, ${\texttt{Maple}}$, ${\texttt{REDUCE/Redlog}}$ or ${\texttt{Mathematica}}$ leads us to introduce and reflect on some new approaches (e.g., partial elimination of quantifiers, consideration of symmetries, relevance of discovery vs. proving, etc.) that could be relevant to consider for future improvements of automated reasoning in geometry algorithms. As a byproduct, we obtain an original result (to our knowledge) concerning the family of triangles inscribable in a given triangle.</p></abstract>
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Subject
General Mathematics
Reference49 articles.
1. C. Abar, Z. Kovács, T. Recio, R. Vajda, Connecting Mathematica and GeoGebra to explore inequalities on planar geometric constructions, Brazilian Wolfram Technology Conference, Sa o Paulo, November, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zoltan_Kovacs13/publication/337499405_Abar-Kovacs-Recio-Vajdanb/data/5ddc5439299bf10c5a33438a/Abar-Kovacs-Recio-Vajda.nb 2. P. Boutry, G. Braun, J. Narboux, Formalization of the arithmetization of Euclidean plane geometry and applications, J. Symb. Comput., 90 (2019), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2018.04.007 3. F. Botana, M. Hohenwarter, P. Janičić, Z. Kovács, I. Petrović, T. Recio, et al., Automated Theorem Proving in GeoGebra: Current Achievements, J. Autom. Reasoning, 55 (2015), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-015-9326-4 4. B. Bollobás, An extremal problem for polygons inscribed in a convex curve, Can. J. Math., 19 (1967), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1967-045-5 5. O. Bottema, R. Žž. Djordjevič, R. R. Janič, D. S. Mitrinovič, P. M. Vasic, Geometric Inequalities, Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningen, 1969.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|