Affiliation:
1. Institute of Mineralogy, South Urals Federal Research Center of Mineralogy and Geoecology UB RAS
2. St. Petersburg State University
Abstract
Research subject. The horizons of ferruginous sedimentary rocks in the massive sulfide deposits of the Urals.Aim. To estimate the Ti behavior upon halmyrolytic transformation and lithogenesis of calcareous hyaloclastites and carbonatesulfide-hyaloclastite sediments.Materials and methods. Microtextures of authigenic aggregates of Ti minerals (anatase, rutile, titanite) in jasperites and gossanites of various Urals massive sulfide deposits were studied. The minerals were identified using microscopic and electron microscopic methods, as well as electron back-scattered diffraction.Results. Upon partial halmyrolysis of calcareous hyaloclastites, Ti was removed with the formation of authigenic anatase rims around hematitized hyaloclasts. The full transformation of hyaloclastites to hematite-quartz jasperites resulted in decomposition of authigenic Ti minerals. Authigenic rutile and titanite formed in gossanites (hematite-quartz and hematite-chlorite products of submarine oxidation of calcareous sulfide-hyaloclastite sediments). The occurrence of abundant bacteriomorphic structures in corroded hyaloclasts indicates a significant role of bacteria in halmyrolysis.Conclusions. Titanium for the formation of Ti minerals in ferruginous sediments was sourced from hyaloclastites. The halmyrolysis of calcareous hyaloclastite sediments and related formation of jasperites occurred under alkaline conditions favorable for the transportation of Ti in the form of hydroxycarbonate complexes. The formation of rutile instead of anatase was associated with lower pH values (<5) due to oxidation of pyrite in sulfide-bearing hyaloclastite sediments. Titanite formed as a result of further alteration of Ti-bearing phases. Our results solve the fundamental problem of Ti mobility during halmyrolysis of hyaloclastites, which contradicts its commonly accepted immobility in hydrothermal processes.
Subject
Stratigraphy,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics
Reference58 articles.
1. Agapova G.F., Modnikov E.M., Shmariovich E.M. (1989) Experimental study of titanium behavior in thermal sulfide-carbonate solutions. Geol. Rudn. Mestorozhd., (2), 73-79. (In Russ.)
2. Alt J.C. (1988) Hydrothermal oxide and nontronite deposits on seamounts in the Eastern Pacific. Mar. Geol., 81, 227-239.
3. Ayupova N.R., Maslennikov V.V. (2012) Biomineralization in ferruginous-siliceous sediments of massive sulfide deposits of the Urals. Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 442, 193-195.
4. Ayupova N.R., Maslennikov V.V., Tessalina S.G., Shilovsky O.P., Sadykov S.A., Hollis S.P., Danyushevsky L.V., Safina N.P., Statsenko E.O. (2017) Tube fossils from gossanites of the Urals VHMS deposits, Russia: authigenic mineral assemblages and trace element distributions. Ore Geol. Rev., 85, 107-130. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.08.003
5. Banerjee N.R., Furnes H., Muehlenbachs K., Staudigel H., de Wit M. (2006) Preservation of ~3.4–3.5 Ga microbial biomarkers in pillow lavas and hyaloclastites from the Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 241, 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. epsl.2005.11.011