Author:
Wu Fangzhou,Liao Jingwen,Tokach Mike,Dritz Steve,Woodworth Jason,Goodband Robert,DeRouchey Joel,Vahl Christopher,Calderon-Cartagena Hilda,Van De Stoet Denise
Abstract
Objective: Determine seasonal patterns of nursery and finisher growth performance in 3 commercial US production systems located in the midwest. Materials and methods: Five years of production records, including 5039 nursery and 5354 finisher production batches, were collected from 3 production systems. Explanatory variables include system, site, pig-flow type, feeder type, batch size, week of placement, average days-on-feed, fill length, number of sow farm sources, dietary energy, mortality, and initial body weight. Week of placement served as the unit for seasonal patterns. Nursery and finisher performance (average daily gain [ADG], average daily feed intake [ADFI], and gain to feed ratio [G:F]) were analyzed in separate datasets using multi-level linear mixed models. A guided stepwise selection approach was used to select fixed variables and their interactions. Seasonality curves were generated using rolling averages of least squares means with a 5-week window and 1-week step-size. Results: For nursery, the seasonality effect was significant (P < .001) for ADG, ADFI, but not for G:F. Nursery ADG and ADFI decreased as week of placement progressed from the 1st to 20th week of a year but increased thereafter. All finisher growth responses were affected by week of placement (P < .001) but the pattern and magnitude of seasonal variability differed among systems (system × week interactions, P < .02). Implications: Seasonal variability of nursery and finisher performance can be quantified using production records in a multi-level linear mixed model. Seasonality effects on finisher performance were system dependent, while nursery seasonality shared more similarity among investigated systems.
Publisher
American Association of Swine Veterinarians
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals
Reference15 articles.
1. Climatic effects on productive traits in livestock;Nardone;Vet Res Commun,2006
2. Effects of seasonality and ambient temperature on genetic parameters for production and reproductive traits in pigs;CR;Anim Prod Sci,2011
3. 3. Bahnson P, Dial G. Factors associated with output and efficiency in growing and finishing swine. Proc AASP. Omaha, Nebraska. 1995:305-310.
4. 4. St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86(E. Suppl.):52-77.
5. 5. Chen X, Ender P, Mitchell M, Wells C. Regression with Stata. UCLA Institute for Digital Research and Education. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/webbooks/reg/chapter2/stata-webbooksregressionwith-statachapter-2-regression-diagnostics/. Published 2003. Accessed May 15, 2018.