Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of Two Smart Bands Selected That Count Steps at Different Walking Speed
Author:
YILDIZ Mehmet Emin1ORCID, GÜNEL İlker2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, REKREASYON BÖLÜMÜ, REKREASYON ANABİLİM DALI 2. UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, SPOR YÖNETİCİLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, SPOR YÖNETİCİLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Whether activity monitor smart wristbands that have become widespread can accurately estimate the step count while walking is a matter of curiosity. The current study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of step count (SC) estimation at normal walking and fast walking pace under controlled conditions of two selected smart wristbands of the leading wearable device vendors, Xiaomi (Mi4) and Huawei (H4). Twenty healthy adult male and twenty healthy adult female were included in the study and analyzed separately. The mean age of male and female participants was 22.25 and 21.62 years, with BMI values of 24.22 kg/m2 and 21.42 kg/m2, respectively. The above-ground walking protocol consisted of four separate five-minute tests: Normal Walking Test, Normal Walking Retest, Fast Walking Test, and Fast Walking Retest. In the study, the analyses were performed by using activity monitor measurements and criterion measurements (the number of steps determined from video recordings), compatibility of test-retest measurement values, error indicators (MPE and MAPE), Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. According to the current study results, it was revealed that the MAPE values recorded for Mi4 and H4 smart wristbands for both normal and fast walking pace in male and female participants were <5%, which was deemed excellent. According to all analyses, the H4 device was found to be valid and reliable, but according to ICC and Pearson Correlation analyses, the Mi4 device was not found to be valid and reliable at fast walking pace.
Funder
This study has no funding.
Publisher
Pamukkale University
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Education
Reference28 articles.
1. Amazon, (2023 Nov 29). "Smart Band" Results. https://www.amazon.com 2. An, H. S., Jones, G. C., Kang, S. K., Welk, G. J., & Lee, J. M. (2017). How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?. European journal of sport science, 17(3), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261 3. Bassett, D. R., Jr., Toth, L. P., LaMunion, S. R., & Crouter, S. E. (2017). Step Counting: A Review of Measurement Considerations and Health-Related Applications. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 47(7), 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0663-1 4. Bunn, J. A., Navalta, J. W., Fountaine, C. J., & Reece, J. D. (2018). Current State of Commercial Wearable Technology in Physical Activity Monitoring 2015-2017. International journal of exercise science, 11(7), 503–515. PMC5841672 5. Carlin, T., & Vuillerme, N. (2021). Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment. JMIR research protocols, 10(1), e21262. https://doi.org/10.2196/21262
|
|