A Qualitative Perspective on Anti-Doping: Mixed Methods Research
Author:
ÖMERCİOĞLU Mine1ORCID, ERMAN Alparslan2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ VE SPORCU YETİŞTİRME UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ 2. AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, SPOR YÖNETİCİLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ, SPOR YÖNETİM BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
National and international anti-doping programs are carried out to protect athletes' health, establish an equal and fair competition environment, and defend the basic principles of sports. This study aims to determine the situation regarding the prevention of doping in sports in Türkiye and the recommendations that can be presented to the national sports administration on anti-doping in line with the findings to be obtained. The study was designed with the explanatory sequential design participant selection sub-design, a mixed method research. Three hundred-two people, determined by the purposeful sampling technique, participated in the research. After evaluating the quantitative findings obtained using the questionnaire technique, in-depth interviews were conducted for the qualitative part of the research with 12 people who met the criteria determined among all the participants. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data, and theme analysis, descriptive analysis, content analysis, analytical generalization, and discourse analysis were performed in qualitative data analysis. As a result of this research, it is understood that training activities prepared to increase the knowledge and awareness level of sports professionals are considered a more effective method for doping prevention than criminal sanctions. In line with the findings obtained, it is understood that there is a need to establish an independent, multi-faceted anti-doping organization in which all relevant stakeholders are involved and a national action plan in which more importance is attached to guidance and training activities.
Publisher
Pamukkale University
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Education
Reference29 articles.
1. Angelo Corlett, J., Brown JR, V. & Kirkland, K. (2013). “Coping With Doping”. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 40(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2012.725897 2. Backhouse, SH., McKenna, J. & Patterson, L. (2009). Prevention Through Education: A Review of Current International Social Science Literature: A Focus on the Prevention of Bullying, Tobacco, Alcohol and Social Drug Use in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults. Project Report. World Anti-Doping Agency. 3. Backhouse, SH., Patterson, L. & McKenna, J. (2012). “Achieving the Olympic Ideal: Preventing Doping in Sport”. Performance Enhancement and Health, 1(2), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2012.08.001 4. Balcı, V., Gök, Y., & Akoğlu, HE. (2018). Türkiye’nin Ulusal Gençlik ve Spor Politikalarının, Sürdürülebilirliğin Sosyal Boyutuyla İncelenmesi. Journal of Sport Science Resarch, 3(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.25307/jssr.399823 5. Barkoukis, V., Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Ourda, D., Agnello, S., Andjelkovic, M., Bochaver, K., Folkers, D., Bondarev, D., Dikic, N., Dreiskämper, D., Petróczi, A., Strauss, B., & Zelli, A. (2022). The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 60, 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102173
|
|