Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid anti-adhesion gel in surgical correction of distal tubal occlusion in restoring natural fertility in patients with infertility.
Materials and methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted. The main group (group 1) included 54 women; the comparison group (group 2) included 58 women with tuboperitoneal infertility due to distal occlusion of the fallopian tubes. In group 1 patients, at the final stage of endoscopic reconstructive plastic surgery on the surface of the fallopian tubes, anti-adhesion barrier Anti-adhesion was applied (5 mL per each operated fallopian tube). Primary outcomes (patency of the fallopian tubes after 3 months) and secondary outcomes (onset of uterine pregnancy during the first year) were assessed. Statistical results were processed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 software package.
Results. Within 3 months after surgical treatment, the patency of the fallopian tubes was reported in 32 (59.3%) group 1 patients and 24 (41.4%) group 2 patients (2=3.445; p=0.064). The rate of uterine pregnancy in group 1 during the first year after surgical treatment was significantly higher than in group 2: 21 (38.9%) and 12 (20.7%) women, respectively (2=4.447; p=0.035).
Conclusion. Endoscopic reconstructive plastic surgeries using hyaluronic acid-based anti-adhesion gel in patients with distal tubal occlusion slightly reduces the frequency of postoperative reocclusions of the fallopian tubes within 3 months after surgical treatment and significantly increase the rate of uterine pregnancy during the year after surgery mainly due to patients with grade IIIIV of adhesive process in the pelvis.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference16 articles.
1. Сухих Г.Т., Назаренко Т.А. Бесплодный брак. Современные подходы к диагностике и лечению: руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010 [Sukhikh GT, Nazarenko TA. Besplodnyi brak. Sovremennyie podkhody k diagnostike i lecheniiu: rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2010 (in Russian)].
2. Доброхотова Ю.Э., Гришин И.И., Гришин А.И. Опыт применения противоспаечного барьера у пациенток с трубно-перитонеальным фактором бесплодия. РМЖ. 2017;15:1141-3 [Dobrokotova YuE, Grishin II, Grishin AI. Experience of the use of an adhesion barrier in patients with tubal peritoneal factor infertility. RMJ. 2017;15:1141-3 (in Russian)].
3. Тихомиров А.Л., Геворкян М.А., Сарсания С.И. Риски спаечного процесса при хирургических вмешательствах в гинекологии и их профилактика. Проблемы репродукции. 2016;22(6):66-73 [Tikhomirov AL, Gevorkian MA, Sarsaniia SI. The risk of postoperative adhesions in gynecology and their prevention. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2016;22(6):66-73 (in Russian)].
4. Ahmad G, Cheong YC, Metwally ME, Watson AJS. The use of adhesion prevention agents in obstetrics and gynaecology. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2013.
5. Сопуев А.А., Ормонов М.К., Кудаяров Э.Э., и др. Некоторые современные представления о послеоперационном спаечном процессе в брюшной полости. Научное обозрение. Медицинские науки. 2020;3:21-8 [Sopuiev AA, Ormonov MK, Kudaiarov EE, et al. Nekotoryie sovremennyie predstavleniia o posleoperatsionnom spaiechnom protsesse v bryushnoi polosti. Nauchnoie obozreniie. Meditsinskiie nauki. 2020;3:21-8 (in Russian)].