Patients Undergoing Elective Inpatient Major Therapeutic Procedures in Florida Had No Significant Change in Hospital Mortality or Mortality-Related Comorbidities Between 2007 and 2019

Author:

Epstein Richard H.1,Dexter Franklin2,Fahy Brenda G.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

2. Division of Management Consulting, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a recent study, rapid response team implementation at 1 hospital was associated with only a 0.1% reduction in inpatient mortality from 2005 to 2018, characterized in the accompanying editorial as a “tepid” improvement. The editorialist postulated that an increase in the degree of illness of hospitalized patients might have masked a larger reduction that otherwise might have occurred. Impressions of greater patient acuity during the studied period might have been an artifact of efforts to document more comorbidities and complications, possibly facilitated by the change in diagnosis coding from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10). METHODS: We used inpatient data from every nonfederal hospital in Florida from the last quarter of 2007 through 2019. We studied hospitalizations for major therapeutic surgical procedures with lengths of stay ≥2 days. Using logistic regression with clustering by the Clinical Classification Software (CCS) code of the primary surgical procedure, we evaluated the trends for decreased mortality, changes in the prevalence of Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) with complications or comorbidities (CC) or major complications or major comorbidities (MCC), and changes in the van Walraven index (vWI), a measure of patient comorbidities associated with increased inpatient mortality. Also incorporated in the modeling was the change from ICD-9 to ICD-10. RESULTS: There were 3,151,107 hospitalizations comprising 130 distinct CCS codes and 453 MS-DRG groups among 213 hospitals. Despite a progressive increase of 4.1% per year in the odds of a CC or MCC (P = .001), there were no significant changes in the marginal estimates of in-house mortality over time (net estimated decrease, 0.036%; 99% confidence interval [CI], −0.168% to 0.097%; P = .49). There was also absence of a significantly greater fraction of discharges with vWI >0 attributable to the year of the study (odds ratio, 1.017 per year; 99% CI, 0.995–1.041). The changes in MS-DRG to those with CC or MCC were not increased significantly from either the ICD-10 coding change or the number of years after the change. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the previous study, there was at most a small decrease in the mortality rate over a 12-year period. We found no reliable evidence that patients undergoing elective inpatient surgical procedures were any sicker in 2019 than in 2007. There were substantively more comorbidities and complications documented over time, but this was unrelated to the change to ICD-10 coding.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Effect of a rapid response team on the incidence of in-hospital mortality.;Factora;Anesth Analg,2022

2. Finding value in rapid response.;Dutton;Anesth Analg,2022

3. More surgery in December among US patients with commercial insurance is offset by unrelated but lesser surgery among patients with Medicare insurance.;Dexter;Int J Health Plann Manage,2022

4. Elective surgery growth at Florida hospitals accrues mostly from surgeons averaging 2 or fewer cases per week: a retrospective cohort study.;Epstein;J Clin Anesth,2022

5. Benchmarking surgeons’ gender and year of medical school graduation associated with monthly operative workdays for multispecialty groups.;Dexter;Cureus,2022

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3