Research ethics during infectious disease outbreaks: a survey of African research stakeholders using the Ebola virus disease outbreak as a case

Author:

Tajudeen RajiORCID,Silaigwana BlessingORCID,Yavlinsky Alexei,Edwards Sarah

Abstract

Introduction. Conducting research during disease outbreaks can be ethically challenging as evidenced in the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa and COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, there has been little empirical research conducted for understanding the views and perspectives of different stakeholders regarding ethical issues in conducting research during disease outbreaks. Objectives. This preliminary study was conducted to empirically explore African public health research stakeholders’ views about research ethics issues during infectious disease outbreaks in Africa. Design. We conducted an online survey of 330 participants attending the International Conference on Re-emerging and Emerging Infectious Disease (ICREID) meeting that took place from 13-15 March 2019 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to elicit their views on various research ethics complexities experienced in the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Results. Study results revealed some divergent views on several ethical themes including: ethics of using unregistered interventions in outbreaks; acceptable study design; ethics review processes; risks-benefit assessment; exclusion of pregnant women and children; and biological sample and data sharing. Majority (76.3%) of respondents felt that in the absence of available standard treatments or prevention modalities, the use of investigational interventions can be ethically justifiable if there is a strong scientific rationale and favorable risk-benefit ratio. Regarding conventional placebo-controlled trials during outbreaks with high case fatality rates, respondents that considered this unethical were more than three times those that felt such design were ethically justifiable. We were somewhat surprised that a majority (almost 60%) of respondents were satisfied with the exclusion of pregnant women and children in clinical trials during outbreaks. All respondents concurred with the prioritization of informed consent for research during an outbreak. Conclusions. Based on our findings, research ethics guidance is needed to equip research stakeholders in dealing with ethical complexities arising in the conduct of research during emerging disease outbreaks - especially regarding using experimental interventions; placebo trial design; inclusion or justified exclusion of pregnant women and children; and biological sample/data sharing. The findings will be used in ongoing efforts of developing a consultative and coherent African-centric framework to support ethical conduct of research for future emerging infectious disease outbreaks in Africa.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference34 articles.

1. Heymann DL, Chen L, Takemi K, et al. Global health security: the wider lessons from the West African Ebola virus disease epidemic. Lancet 2015; 385: 1884–1901

2. Macklin R, Cowan E. Conducting research in disease outbreaks. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009; 3: e335.

3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Committee. Integrating clinical research into epidemic response: the Ebola experience. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2017

4. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24739/integrating-clinical-research-into-epidemic-response-the-ebola-experience

5. Calain P. The Ebola clinical trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters. J Med Ethics 2016; 44:3-8

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3