Abstract
This paper argues that the positions of select stones at Stonehenge reveal a lunar calendar which is integrated with a solar calendar, and that this was intentionally included in the design of the monument. In particular, the analysis shows that Stone 11, which is half the size of the others, is pivotal in both the lunar and solar timelines. Further, it is argued that this stone also marked the midwinter sunrise, its shadow making contact with Bluestone 40 similar to the way in which the Heel Stone indicates midsummer sunrise by its shadow falling upon the Altar Stone.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Archeology,Archeology
Reference7 articles.
1. Abbott, M. and H. Anderson-Whymark, 2012. Stonehenge Laser Scan: Archaeological Analysis Report. English Heritage Report Series 32-2012. London: English Heritage [online]. Accessed July 2022, https://historicengland.org.uk/research/results/reports/32-2012
2. Cleal, R. M. J., K. E. Walker and R. Montague, 1995. Stonehenge in its Landscape: Twentieth Century Excavations. London: English Heritage.
3. Darvill, T., 2016. “Houses of the Holy: Architecture and Meaning in the Structure of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK”. Time and Mind 9: 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2016.1171496
4. Darvill, T., 2022. “Keeping Time at Stonehenge”. Antiquity 96 (386): 319–335. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2022.5
5. Daw, T., 2015. “The Twisted Trilithon: Stone 56 and its Skew”. Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine 108: 15–24.