Author:
Ke Sihui (Echo),Xia Yuyan,Zhang Jing
Abstract
Home language and literacy input (HLLI) is critical for linguistic and literacy development in bilingual children. This exploratory study investigated home oral, and print input for Chinese heritage language learners between four and six years old in the United States and aimed to identify salient types of input associated with speaking and reading abilities in the heritage language (Chinese) and the societal language (English). Fifty-three parents completed a HLLI questionnaire and rated the speaking and reading competencies in Chinese and English of their children. The relationships between HLLI and bilingual abilities were examined via principal component analysis and regression. There were two major findings: first, Chinese speaking ability mainly depended on oral language exchange between parents and their children, as well as print exposure to Chinese; Chinese reading ability was associated with oral language exchange between parents and their children, as well as pinyin/bopomofo practice at home. Second, both speaking and reading abilities in English were significantly and positively related to children’s interest in reading English only. Evidence-based recommendations are provided regarding home language and literacy practices for young Chinese heritage language learners in the United States.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference31 articles.
1. August, D. and Shanahan, T. (2006) Developing literacy in second-language learners. Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Chung, S. C., Chen, X., and Geva, E. (2019) Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer in bilingual reading development: an interactive framework. Journal of Neurolinguistics 50: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.003
3. Cummins, J. (2005) A proposal for action: strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal 89(4): 585–592.
4. DeKeyser, R. (2020) Input is not a panacea. International Journal of Bilingualism 24 (1): 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768371
5. Dixon, L. Q. and Wu, S. (2014) Home language and literacy practices among immigrant second-language learners. Language Teaching 47 (4): 414–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000160