Radial Osteotomy for Kienböck Disease: Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Younger and Older Patients

Abstract

Background: The usefulness of radial osteotomy for older patients remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of radial osteotomy with volar locking plate between younger and older patients with Kienböck disease stages II to IIIB. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study of 21 consecutive patients treated at our department. Lichtman’s classification was used for staging, and four patients had stage II, six patients had stage IIIA, and 11 patients had stage IIIB disease. We divided them into two groups to compare the radiological and clinical results between younger (younger than 40 years) and older patients. The mean follow-up periods in the younger and older groups were 4 and 3.6 years, respectively. For radiological assessment, we evaluated the carpal height ratio (CHR), Stahl index, and union of the fractured lunate. For clinical assessment, we examined the range of motion of the wrist, grip strength, numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, and the patient-reported Hand20 score preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Results: There were 12 patients in the younger group with a mean age of 23 years (range, 12–37 years), and 9 in the older group with a mean age of 56 years (range, 40–74 years). There were no intra- and post-operative complications in either group. Radiological improvement, including CHR, Stahl index, and union of the fractured lunate, was more common in the younger group than in the older one, as was the case for clinical improvement. However, even in the older group, significant clinical improvement, including the range of motion of the wrist, NRS for pain, and the Hand20 score, was seen postoperatively. Conclusions: Radial osteotomy appears to be a safe and reliable option in older symptomatic patients with Kienböck disease stages II to IIIB.